YWCA Central Alabama

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
630288882
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Birmingham, AL, United States
Phone
2053229922
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,514,461
Expenses
$8,308,810
Assets
$8,940,701
Liabilities
$1,132,361

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

44 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MONICA ROMANO JAN 2024-JULY 2024 (INTERIM CEO)
  • RASHEDA WORKMANAUGUST 2024-PRESENT (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MONICA ROMANO JAN 2024-JULY 2024 (INTERIM CEO): $132,535 total reported compensation
  • SUSAN WILSON (VP OF DEVELOPMENT): $107,366 total reported compensation
  • LESLIE THURSTON JAN 2024-JULY 2024 (VP TALENT AND CULTURE): $67,773 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

YWCA Central Alabama is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all. _YWCA is on a mission. That takes teamwork._ READ OUR STORIES Why give to YWCA Central Alabama? YWCA Central Alabama partners with the people we serve to break generational cycles of poverty, systemic racism and violence. We embrace service participants with reassuring programs that support their journey forward. We advocate for them holistically. We empower them to navigate systems in their lives. Why give to YWCA Central Alabama? Each year...

What it reported doing in 2024

Domestic violence services domestic violence services from the ywca are jefferson/blount/st. Clair counties' only multi-service program for domestic violence. The program offers a 24-hour hotline and secure confidential shelter and counseling, as well as a broad array of services. They are: children in crisis (cic) this weekly support group is for children who have witnessed domestic violence in their homes. Topics addressed include how to be safe in an unsafe home, self-esteem and anger management.family violence center and our place the ywca operates a domestic violence shelter at a confidential location for women and children fleeing abusive homes. Counselors help these women make safety plans, obtain jobs or job training, and work toward independence and self-sufficiency. The shelter serves jefferson, blount and st. Clair counties.court advocacy program this program links victims, whether in a shelter or still at home, with professional advocates who provide guidance through the often-intimidating legal system. Advocates work with judges, prosecutors and law enforcement and they refer batterers to counseling programs offered by other agencies in blount, jefferson and st. Clair counties.legal assistance to victims-this program links a victim with an attorney who provides guidance through the often-intimidating legal system. Attorneys provide direct, legal services (e.g., family law) for individuals with limited income in blount, jefferson and st. Clair counties.crisis line (322-hurt/4878)-the ywca maintains a 24-hour domestic violence crisis line answered by staff and volunteers trained in crisis intervention. Callers are instructed on how to plan for the safety of themselves and their children. Referrals to confidential shelters are made through the crisis line.domestic violence community outreach-the ywca seeks to promote awareness about domestic and dating violence and works in cooperation with other organizations serving domestic violence victims as well as middle and high schools. The outreach team leads support groups and information sessions at locations throughout the community, as well as assisting women in finding permanent housing.rural advocacy and outreach-the ywca has domestic violence offices located in blount and st. Clair counties. These offices offer court advocacy, outreach and support groups to victims of domestic violence and assist isolated rural victims in accessing social services, safe housing and legal services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.7%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $18.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 98.7% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 40 of 40 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 44 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.