Young Women's Christian Association of Warren Ohio

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
340726064
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2017
Location
Warren, OH, USA
Phone
3303731010
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,271
Expenses
$604,707
Assets
$3,287,055
Liabilities
$60,029

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA ALTIERI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHELLE SCHMADER (VICE PRESIDE)
  • CHERYL MCARTHUR (TRUSTEE)
  • SISTER JEAN ORSUTO (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The ywca of warren is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

What it reported doing in 2017

Girls leadership - is an afterschool program designed to foster strong leadership skills in 9th and 10th grade girls throughout trumbull county, we l.e.t. Girls become tomorrow's leaders through leadership and guidance, empowerment, and transformation. Girls leadership provides resources and workshops that increase self-confidence, equip girls with leadership skills that will give them confidence, improve freindships and communications, increase their academic success, and leave them feeling empowered to make a difference in their own lives and in their community. 7 individuals participated in the program during 2017. Young womens leadership board, the board is comprised of young women, ages 21 to 40, who come from diverse backgrounds and will assist in strengthening the ywca warren's programs and services, community collaboration, and fundraising efforts. Girls camp - the ywca of warren, through a grant from the community foundation, provides a summer camp for girls ages 11-14 and is aimed to address the lacking educational foundations in science, technology, engineering, and math to increase the girls abilities and chances of future academic success, leading a more confident, self-assuring, healthier self- image. 15 individuals participated in the program during 2017.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.5%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 68.5%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -826.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.44; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -59.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.5% of revenue deployed · 68.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $414K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.