Young Women's Christian Association of Bethlehem Pa
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 236395256
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Bethlehem, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4845355263
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $685,826
- Expenses
- $803,654
- Assets
- $2,885,900
- Liabilities
- $49,594
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBYN WEAVER (PRESIDENT)
- JULIA WICOFF (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DELIA MARRERO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DELIA MARRERO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $78,835 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide opportunities for women to enhance leadership skills, develop networks and advocate women's issues. The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity to all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ywca bethlehem provides staff support at the fred b. Rooney building through our partnership with winnresidential, a division of winncompanies. Ywca bethlehem employs a full-time registered nurse to provide health and wellness programming and a full-time residential community coordinator to provide community enrichment and activities. The rooney building is not an official ywca bethlehem program, but it is a collaborative partnership. Ywca bethlehem does not oversee program initiatives or influence their outcomes. The executive director does not supervise the ywca staff on-site at the rooney building. The winncompanies property manager of the rooney building provides managerial oversight of the staff. Ywca bethlehem receives administrative funding and support from winnresidential.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 77.8%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.59; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.1% of revenue deployed · 77.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $625K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $79K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.