Young Mens Institute

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237553152
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
South San Francisco, CA, USA
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$74,053
Expenses
$54,546
Assets
$263,169

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ron Serchia (President)
  • Michael Torres (First Vice President)
  • Paul Walsh (Second Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Ron Serchia (President)
  • Michael Torres (First Vice President)
  • Paul Walsh (Second Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Young Mens Institute established in 1883 is a Benevolent Fraternal Catholic Mens Organization who wish to improve the Catholic Faith for families social moral and intellectual betterment. The Council in that mental state sponsors a food basket program every year at Christmas for 300 needy families toys for the children and through our scholarship program for those contiuning in their higher education and those who are entering a Catholic High School.

What it reported doing in 2025

Scholarship Program for those members children who continue their High School education in a Catholic School and support for those who continue their higher education in college no matter where. Five scholarships are sent out to five catholic schools for their candidate each receive 1,500 sent directly to their school of choice. Also 1,500 up to three scholarships are given to members children to help going to collage.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Multi-channel. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 33% for direct work, 31% for grants, and 36% for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.1%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 61.8%; rating input score 62

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.3%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.82; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.1% of revenue deployed · 61.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.