Decatur Family YMCA
Legal name: Young Mens Christian Association of Decatur
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 370661258
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Decatur, IL, USA
- Phone
- 872-9622 x. 129
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,497,844
- Expenses
- $3,616,429
- Assets
- $11,635,391
- Liabilities
- $1,120,962
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LT SCOTT ROSENBERY (PRESIDENT)
- ANGELA FAULK (INTERIM CEO)
- MATTHEW NOONAN (INTERIM CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DOMINIC SANTOMASSIMO (CHIEF EXEC O): $121,782 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
These discounts are just one way we support your health and wellness journey. If you're not yet a member, we invite you to join and take advantage of these exclusive benefits. For more information or to register for any of these programs at the member rate, please contact our front desk or visit our program registration page. Explore the Y footer logo. At Decatur Family YMCA, our mission is _to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all._ We are more than a gym. We are a cause. Rooted in community and guided by our core values—**Caring, Honesty, Respect, and Responsibility** —we work every day to ensure that everyone, regardless of age, income, or background, has the opportunity to learn, grow, and thrive. From wellness classes to youth development, swim lessons to senior programs, the Y is a safe, welcoming space where...
What it reported doing in 2025
Social responsibility incorporates giving back and providing support to our neighbors with programs that include social services, global services, volunteerism and advocacy.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 71.5%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.22; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 72% of revenue deployed · 71.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $122K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.