Young Mens Christian Association of Ardmore Oklahoma

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
730603523
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Ardmore, OK, USA
Phone
5802233990
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,157,498
Expenses
$1,793,588
Assets
$5,314,150
Liabilities
$89,675

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REBECCA MCMILLAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SAM ATENCIO (DIRECTOR)
  • JULIE BARRICK (DIRECTOR)
  • ETHAN BATEMAN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The ardmore family ymca puts christian principles in practice through programs that build "strong kids, strong families, and strong communities."

What it reported doing in 2025

The ardmore family ymca instills christian principles while offering mulitple fitness programs that build "strong kids, strong families, and strong communities." no one is turned away due to inability to pay. Program scholarships are provided for any child or adult who applies and qualifies, whether a member or not. Membership represents approximately 13.8% of the families in our area. Over 2,500 children are served by programs ranging from flag football, baseball, basketball, soccer, swimming, strength training, & after-school mentoring. The ymca's weekly television public service programming provides information directly to the homes in our area. The ardmore family ymca received private grants and donations towards operations in 2025 of 1,011,251. These donations allow membership fees to remain affordable for all, free to some, resulting in over 1,000,000 in program and membership discounts given. The senior citizen programs include exercise classes on land and water, and volunteer programs to include them as mentors in all of the youth programs. A walking for fitness program with a certified trainer is provided to the public at no charge. A senior citizen exercise group currently uses the facility twice weekly at no cost.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $24.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.9%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.96; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.4% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.