Young Men's Christian Association of South Palm Beach County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
591416281
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Boca Raton, FL, USA
Phone
5613959622
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,105,290
Expenses
$15,490,618
Assets
$23,034,713
Liabilities
$3,628,844

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

38 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JASON HAGENSICK (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • BARRY DAVIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • BRYAN HUNT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JASON HAGENSICK (PRESIDENT/CEO): $361,097 total reported compensation
  • BONNIE J SNOW (CFO): $159,757 total reported compensation
  • BARRY DAVIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $157,251 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the y is to put christian principles into practice through programs that promote a healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. In palm beach county, the ymca serves as a community anchor, strengthening lives through a focus on youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility. In 2025, the y provided more than $1,840,000 in financial assistance to individuals and families, ensuring equitable access to membership and programs regardless of ability to pay. This commitment reflects the y's dedication to inclusion and community impact.

What it reported doing in 2025

Prime time the y partners with prime time of palm beach county, with funding support from the children's services council, to deliver expanded learning opportunities at title i schools throughout palm beach county. Prime time establishes quality standards and provides technical assistance, assessments, and enrichment resources to afterschool providers serving communities with higher economic need. In 2025, the y served: * 92 afterschool and summer program sites * 4,048 youth and adults these programs provide academic support, enrichment activities, and health-focused programming in safe, structured environments that support working families and student success. Community support in 2025: * $2,357,000 was contributed by donors and partners * 20,710 individuals received financial assistance * $916,000 supported community programs at no cost programs included community family events, summer camps for children of migrant workers, respite care for children with disabilities, and water safety initiatives. The y delivered 3,253 swim lessons, including 1,095 at-risk youth, and plays a leadership role in coordinated drowning prevention efforts across palm beach county through initiatives such as watersmart, collaborating with local partners to reduce drowning risks and improve community safety. Special needs program the y provides inclusive programming for youth and young adults with disabilities, including individuals who are neurodivergent (such as those with autism). This program supports social development, life skills training, recreational engagement, and integrated participation alongside typically developing peers when appropriate. Serving individuals ages 5-22, the program includes appropriate staffing ratios and transportation support to ensure accessibility. In 2025, 70 participants benefited from these services, reflecting the y's commitment to dignity, inclusion, and full community participation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 65% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.8%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.49; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.8% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 34 of 34 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $13.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $361K · 38 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $102K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.