Young Men's Christian Association of Grant County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 350886981
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Marion, IN, USA
- Phone
- 7656640544
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,930,174
- Expenses
- $2,030,125
- Assets
- $7,775,650
- Liabilities
- $2,052
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ADAM MYERS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ADAM MYERS (CEO): $106,916 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
What it reported doing in 2025
Social responsibility at the grant county family ymca, social responsibility means strengthening the foundations of our community by bringing people together, addressing community needs, and ensuring opportunities remain accessible to all. We continue to remove financial barriers that prevent individuals and families from participating in programs that improve health, well-being, and quality of life. During 2025, the ymca provided 401,940 in financial assistance and subsidized services through membership assistance, childcare support, program scholarships, corporate wellness partnerships, and other community support initiatives. These resources help ensure that no individual or family is excluded from ymca programs because of financial circumstances. Beyond direct assistance, the ymca has emerged as a key community partner and convener. Throughout the year, we expanded relationships with local schools, municipalities, businesses, churches, and nonprofit organizations to increase our collective impact. Our partnership with youth for christ created additional opportunities for teen engagement and mentorship, while collaborations with school districts expanded critical youth development and water safety programming. Community engagement also reached new levels through events that brought residents together and fostered civic pride. Programs such as the daddy daughter dance, corporate challenge, community wellness initiatives, and numerous special events experienced some of the highest participation levels in ymca recent history, creating opportunities for connection, belonging, and community celebration. As our impact continues to grow, so does our vision for the future. During the past year, the ymca advanced plans for a second facility in gas city that will expand access to ymca programs and services throughout grant county. Scheduled to open by june 1, 2027, the new facility is projected to increase ymca membership by approximately 1,170 membership units while significantly expanding opportunities for youth development, healthy living, and community engagement across the region. The ymca has become a trusted voice in conversations involving community development, health, youth services, and quality-of-life initiatives. By working alongside local governments, nonprofit organizations, educational institutions, businesses, and philanthropic partners, we are helping create a stronger, healthier, and more connected grant county. Together, we are building more than programs and facilitieswe are building a community where every person has the opportunity to belong, contribute, and thrive.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 75.4%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.2%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.83; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.3% of revenue deployed · 75.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $107K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.