YMCA of Douglas County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930395593
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Roseburg, OR, USA
Phone
541-440-9622
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,814,967
Expenses
$3,711,938
Assets
$6,921,097
Liabilities
$368,721

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DORI JOHN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHELLEY BRIGGS-LOOSLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • STEVEN STANFIELD (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEVEN STANFIELD (CEO): $110,349 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The YMCA of Douglas County is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with the mission of building strong kids, strong families, and strong communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Social responsibility - we host our annual ymca water safety day at the ymca campus, giving away 250 life jackets, free swim lesson gift certificates, and information to parents about keeping their children safe in, on and around the water. We offer free redwoods sexual abuse prevention training to our staff. We are mandatory reporters and want our employees and volunteers to be prepared to assist when the need arises. As a leader in the "respect the water campaign", in the month of may we install five water safety stations along the rivers for the summer at popular sites in the roseburg area in support of international water safety. We maintain them through the summer months to assure the life saving ring bouys and ropes are intact for use. We were instrumental in the installation of a temperature sensor in the cold north umpqua river that provides live temperature readings that are posted on the ymca and local media websites and in the local newspaper. We also provide financial assistance to people who otherwise may not be able to afford to be a member and participate in ymca programs and services. Our licensed childcare partnered with a local community college as a practicum site for their early childhood development programs. All of our child care staff are trained in child sexual abuse prevention and awareness. With grants from local foundations we were able to feed over 1,500 nourishing meals and snacks to our childcare and camp participants throughout the summer.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 89% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.96 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 80.6% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 15 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.