Young Men's Christian Assoc of Shawnee Ok
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 730602462
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Shawnee, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4052734386
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,693,707
- Expenses
- $2,037,037
- Assets
- $6,011,807
- Liabilities
- $232,810
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL JOBE (CEO)
- ROBERT MCNEIL (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL JOBE (CEO): $71,648 total reported compensation
- ROBERT MCNEIL (CEO): $39,792 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Social responsibility: as a leading not-for-profit committed to strengthening community through youth development, healthy living and social responsibility, the y was created in response to social challenges and remains to this day a lifeline in communities around the world. The y understands the challenges that keep individuals from reaching their full potential and responds with services and support which help people to be self-reliant, productive and connected to the community. Each y responds to the unique issues influencing the community and provides support through services focused on critical areas, such as child welfare, community health, quality of life or family services. To bring about meaningful change, individuals need ongoing encouragement and tools. We're here day-in and day-out to provide resources our communities need. The y addresses social issues through our programs and activities for our seniors, youth and families. The y supports diversity and inclusion in all of our programs by never turning anyone away due to their inability to pay for a program or service. Our financial assistance towards the programs and services of the y make it possible for every individual to have access to the programs that can assist them in reaching their god given potential. Through the support of hundreds of volunteers, and the donations from individuals and corporations the y is able to give back to the communities we serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 77.9%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.95; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.9% of revenue deployed · 77.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.