Young Gifted & Green
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831920312
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 9012894625
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $606,981
- Expenses
- $712,860
- Assets
- $775,934
- Liabilities
- $48,876
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LaTricea D Adams (CEO & President)
People named in this filing
- Joshua Perkins (Chief Operating Officer)
- Jessica Staton (Treasurer)
- Ashley Strozier (Chair/Interim Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bringing like-minded organizations together to collectively take action and advocate against the crisis of lead exposure and environmental injustice specifically in disadvantaged communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
PROGRAM NAME: Youth EJ Programs DESCRIPTION: The Youth EJ (Environmental Justice) Program is a powerful leadership initiative that centers the voices of Black and Latinx Gen Z leaders in Flint and the surrounding Genesee County area. A cohort of 3-5 empowered youth from across Flint and Genesee will serve a full year term. YGG will assist the youth council members on becoming environmental activists and help them build platforms to speak on EJ issues (political advocacy and community organizing) at a local, state, and national level. The Council will also be a representative of YGG when youth opportunities arise. There will be opportunities for in-person convenings like the Congressional Black Caucus Annual Legislative Conference and the annual Flint Weekend of Service.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.7%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 47.4%; rating input score 47
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.7% of revenue deployed · 47.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $106K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.