Young Fathers of Central Florida

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
711016365
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
4074239400
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$208,104
Expenses
$211,335
Assets
$-282
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HAKI NKRUMAH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • HAKI NKRUMAH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $77,416 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide young fathers under the age of 24 years with supportive community-based resources to assist them in actively participating in the lives of thier children and families in order to strengthen thier communities. Our goal is to reach those young fathers who are ignored.

What it reported doing in 2025

The state of Florida entered into a cost reimbursement contract with the organization for their assistance with their ncpep program. This program was designed to assist unemployed and or underemployed non- custodian parent in making regular child support payments through obtaining and maintaning employment. Of 250 young fathers, we assisted 107 of the fathers with obtaining and maintaining full time and part time employment. Our programs service efforts included one on one counseling, child support payments, and vaious other personal development program activities. The orlando community and youth trust inc entered into a contract with the young fathers organization to rpovide parental training and development along with their participation. The contract required certain information and data relating to the participants attendance and pre/post testing information. The contract required no other restrictions. The organization is currently meeting the contract requirements. Aetna cvs sponsored a community event various individual donation and sponsorship of certain programs performed by the organization

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 73% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.5%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 36.9%; rating input score 37
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.06 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: -0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 36.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -71.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -242.3% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.5% of revenue deployed · 36.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $78K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $77K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.