Young and Brave Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 451564197
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Ventura, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8052086242
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,195
- Expenses
- $89,733
- Assets
- $108,228
- Liabilities
- $224
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NATHANIEL CURRAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOSHUA CURRAN (CFO): $8,700 total reported compensation
- NATHANIEL CURRAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $7,395 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dedicated to helping today's youth beat cancer. We aim to help these brave fighters and their families overcome the challenges and hardships brought upon by cancer. Built on the foundation of love we exist to inspire, encourage, inform, as well as to invest directly into treatment and recovery. We do so through networking, fundraising drives, community building, and financial support. Our one goal is to fight cancer alongside those that shouldn't fight alone.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our foundation raises funds for families of young adults battling cancer. We aim to educate, inform as well as invest directly in the families to help with the burden and hardships brought on by a cancer diagnosis. During this year, the foundation has donated to 6 different cancer patients and their families. The recipients are able to use the funds to pay for medical expenses, living expenses and/or help compensate for lost wages due to illness. Additionally, an online fundraising platform was created and maintained where young cancer patients and their families can tell their stories, offer and receive emotional support, and the general public can donate funds directly to patients struggling with cancer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 67% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 62
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 57.8%; rating input score 58
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -49.1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.4% of revenue deployed · 57.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $9K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.