Young American Sailing Academy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823186776
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- RYE, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9177151471
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Swimming & Other Water Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,140
- Expenses
- $41,926
- Assets
- $125,218
- Liabilities
- $2,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER BECKER (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- PETER BECKER (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- JOSEPH COOPER (SECRETARY/DIRECTOR)
- ERICK BLANC (TREASURER/DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The young american sailing academy (yasa) is where, through the rigors of offshore sailing, young sailors develop into skilled and highly confident individuals with robust character. Yasa is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit public charitable organization whose vision is to educate and develop a new generation of USA based offshore sailors. Yasa's multiple programs are geared to bringing offshore sailing skills to as many young corinthian sailors as possible as well as developing strong female leaders.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization has two programs: level 100 - juniors are given the "keys and their independence, supported by focused adult coaching. This level is primarily focused on high school aged sailors interested in developing their big boat and offshore skills. These sailors gain sea miles and practice skills while competing in inshore and coastal races from early may to late september. The sailors in this program have accessed to the j/105 young american to train and compete. Level 200- is designed primarily for experienced college aged sailors with the desire to expand their ocean sailing skills. Level 200 is campaign based i.e. We build a team around a boat and a specific race or series of races. Some campaigns such as newport bermuda race will require a high level of time commitment and intensity. Each level 200 campaign will be made up from yasa sailing team members on an application selection basis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 68.8%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.99; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.2% of revenue deployed · 68.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $29K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.