You Are the Difference Foundation Inc Dba Loving Life Group Home
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330647952
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Diamond Bar, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9098612809
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Camps
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $737,113
- Expenses
- $721,203
- Assets
- $79,622
- Liabilities
- $343,076
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BILLIE W BEAN (President)
Highest reported compensation
- BILLIE W BEAN (President): $71,747 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing residential, social, emotional and psychological care to boys ages 12-17 in a licensed facility.
What it reported doing in 2017
Providing psychological, educational and residential care to adolescent boys.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 21
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.6%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 69.1%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.31; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.9%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.6% of revenue deployed · 69.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $498K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.