Yosemite Conservancy
Legal name: Yosemite Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943058041
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, US
- Phone
- 415-434-1782
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parks and Playgrounds
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $24,966,280
- Expenses
- $23,742,469
- Assets
- $55,650,873
- Liabilities
- $6,343,011
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CASSIUS M CASH (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- FRANK DEAN (PRESIDENT/CEO (THRU 1/2025))
Highest reported compensation
- CASSIUS M CASH (PRESIDENT & CEO): $404,834 total reported compensation
- MARION INGERSOLL (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $261,820 total reported compensation
- KEVIN GAY (CFO): $257,481 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Yosemite Conservancy is a nonprofit dedicated to preserving Yosemite National Park’s resources and providing enriching visitor experiences in the park.
What it reported doing in 2025
Park programs: the conservancy supports the preservation and education related roles of the national park service mission through a varied portfolio of public educational programs. The conservancy's outdoor adventures enhance the yosemite experience for park visitors through dozens of interpretive and educational day hikes, backpacking trips and other programs in geology, botany, natural and social history, photography, and the arts. The conservancy also conducts educational field programs on a custom basis and by contract with travel providers. In addition, the conservancy supports art programs and the parson's memorial lodge summer series. The conservancy also helps inspire and train the next generation of stewards by supporting internships, (cont. On sch. O) junior ranger activities, and other youth programs in the park, and helps sustain yosemite-focused leadership programming and educational outreach with university of California, merced.the conservancy's wilderness operations program assists the national park service in ensuring that yosemite backcountry visitors are educated about and prepared for wilderness travel. Conservancy wilderness staff manage the wilderness reservation system, issue permits, sponsor the bear-proof food canister rental program, operate the ostrander ski hut, sell interpretive and orientation materials, and provide visitors with the opportunity for an enjoyable and respectful wilderness experience.the conservancy's volunteer program recruits, trains and manages volunteers who support yosemite through numerous week-long natural resource restoration projects and through a month-long "visitor information assistant" program that improves the experience of hundreds of thousands of park visitors annually.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.1%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.34; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 74.1% of revenue deployed · 70.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $405K · 23 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.