Yorktown Ice Hockey Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770602088
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Phone
7035289321
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,497
Expenses
$57,808
Assets
$42,195

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID SCHRYVER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CLAIRE HARDIE (TREASURER EF)
  • DAVID SCHRYVER (PRESIDENT)
  • CARRIE DUNN (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Yorktown ice hockey club is a 503(c) non-profit supporting yorktown high school hockey club fostering national sports competition. Provides an exciting, competitve, and fun-filled program for high schoolers to experience the thrill of ice hockey. With two competitive teams (varsity and jv), yorktown hockey is committed to elevating each player's game by teaching correct technique, game intelligence, and player safety. All teams are co-ed, and all of our coaches are USA hockey certified and background checked. The club prides itself on developing players that value team success and pracitce exceptional sportsmanship. Yorktown hockey is a club sport and fully funded by the players, the arlington optimists, and other local organizations. The team competes in the northern Virginia scholastic hockey league (nvshl) and against formidable local rivals, providing for fun and exiting events for players and spectators alike.

What it reported doing in 2023

Fostering national or international sports competition.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.8%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 53.5%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 150% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.8% of revenue deployed · 53.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.