York Habitat for Humanity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222670895
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
York, PA, United States
Phone
717-854-6168
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,871,905
Expenses
$1,926,079
Assets
$2,681,029
Liabilities
$1,047,335

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JESSICA FIELDHOUSE (PRESIDENT)
  • HEATHER NOLL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NATASHA KUKORLO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • NATASHA KUKORLO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $88,037 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are a faith-based housing ministry bringing people together to build homes, communities, and hope in York. | Picture | Diversity and Inclusiveness We believe that all people deserve a decent place to live and we welcome people from all walks of life to participate in our program. | Picture | Homeownership We believe in the power of homeownership to encourage hope, build equity, transform lives and build communities. | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Picture | Partnership We believe in drawing families and communities in need together with volunteers and resources to build homes and strengthen neighborhoods. | Picture | Stewardship We are committed to the sustained and efficient use of our financial, environmental and human resources to support our mission and values. |.

What it reported doing in 2024

York habitat for humanity has completed 146 homes in their 40-year history, including 10 of a 16-home revitalization project, extensive home rehabilitations, replaced deteriorating homes and built new homes. Of these 145 homes, york habitat for humanity rehabilitated 49 homes and built 97 new homes. This fiscal year, york habitat for humanity completed 2 new homes. This past year, 638 different volunteers worked on york habitat for humanity's construction sites and more than 3,533 hours were logged on those sites. 960 volunteers donated time and skills off the construction site for york habitat for humanity, including hours donated for the restore, and hours donated by the advisory board, board of directors, and committee members (see sche o) this past year, 8 applications for homeownership were received and 1 was approved. Future buildings include an additional 4 units of new construction on chestnut street in york, Pennsylvania, and 1 home on pine street in york, pennslvania.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.2%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.9%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.39; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 88.2% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.