Yolo Healthy Aging Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461075195
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Woodland, CA, USA
- Phone
- (530) 757-5588
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $266,517
- Expenses
- $278,217
- Assets
- $139,117
- Liabilities
- $11,639
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ally Vigil (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Ally Vigil (Executive Director): $41,670 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the wellbeing of older adults through education, collaboration, and advocacy, serving as the unified voice for older adults in Yolo County.
What it reported doing in 2025
Yolo Healthy Aging Alliance (YHAA) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to enhance the wellbeing of older adults in Yolo County through collaboration, advocacy and education. YHAA works to identify and address gaps in services and connect people to the many resources and services throughout the County. YHAA focused on keeping older adults safe and healthy through a variety of services.During 2025: Yolo Healthy Aging Alliance (YHAA) advanced its mission to enhance the well-being of older adults in Yolo County through education, collaboration, and advocacy. YHAA provided direct services, expanded access to essential resources, and strengthened community-based supports for older adults, with a focus on low-income, rural, and culturally diverse populations.Through the Aging and Disability Resource Connection (ADRC), YHAA delivered case management and resource navigation services, connecting older adults to food, housing, healthcare, and other critical supports. YHAA led an impactful food distribution program from January through June of 2025, that addressed food insecurity, reduced social isolation, and connected older adults to case management and other services. Following that programs end, YHAA continued to support food distribution through a partnership with Meals on Wheels Yolo CountyYHAA supported aging safely at home through its Grab Bar Safety Program and promoted emergency preparedness by developing and distributing multilingual educational materials. To reduce isolation, YHAA matched older adults with volunteers for regular social connection and provided digital inclusion services, including technology training and access support to help older adults engage in telehealth, online services, and virtual communication.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.1%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $30.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 91.1% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $243K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.