Yolo County Vineyard and Winery Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272256386
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Winters, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5303932162
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $55,234
- Expenses
- $29,312
- Assets
- $49,580
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATELYN REIMER (Vice President)
- TIERNEY BATES (President)
People named in this filing
- CHRIS TURKOVICH (Treasurer)
- KATELYN REIMER (Vice President)
- TIERNEY BATES (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote and market the common business interest of wine growers and producers in yolo county, including, but not limited to the areas of capay valley ava, davis, ca, the dunnigan hills ava, winters, ca, woodland, ca and clarksburg ava.
What it reported doing in 2023
-hired first regular employee to manage marketing assets and social media-promoted and hosted 3rd annual yolo wine ramble (county wide)-promoted and hosted 6th annual twilight event (capay valley)-promoted and hosted 2nd annual yolo wine night (clarksburg)-doubled social media followers in two years, worked with numerous influencers and created partnerships with county hoteliers, airports and tourism boards to help accomplish our purpose of promoting and marketing our common business interest-able to net $25,922 in 2023 to help launch our 2024 marketing initiatives
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.9%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.