Yoga 4 A Good Hood Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824764169
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Rochester, NY, USA
Phone
5852605300
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$126,667
Expenses
$97,410
Assets
$47,388
Liabilities
$200

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Imani Olear (Pres./Executive Director)
  • Liz Ortanli (Vice President/Secretary)

People named in this filing

  • Mykel Sapienza (Member)
  • Andrea Cusak (Member)
  • Aqua Porter (Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Yoga 4 A Good Hood (Y4AGH) is a nonprofit dedicated to the education and empowerment of BIPOC and communities living in poverty in order to realize their full potential through the transformative wisdom and practice of yoga, meditation, trainings and nutrition.

What it reported doing in 2021

Provide healthy alternatives through yoga and teaching modules to the community. Regular classes will be held at multiple locations and we will also provide classes occasionally to various non-profit educational organizations. We also provide professional training so that people can get jobs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40.2%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 52.3%; rating input score 52

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 139.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 94.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 90.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 40.2% of revenue deployed · 52.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.