Ymca of the Roses
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 231352600
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- York, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7178120119
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,533,351
- Expenses
- $16,284,827
- Assets
- $57,626,187
- Liabilities
- $15,102,757
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
37 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARDSON LARRY (PRESIDENT/CEO (TIL 6/25))
- SMITH MICHAEL A (VP OF ADMIN - PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- RICHARDSON LARRY (PRESIDENT/CEO (TIL 6/25)): $180,858 total reported compensation
- SMITH MICHAEL A (VP OF ADMIN - PRESIDENT/CEO): $164,934 total reported compensation
- AUMENT CINDY (CFO): $138,437 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the ymca of the roses is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. We exist to develop and practice the principles of faith, hope, love, honesty, respect and responsibility.
What it reported doing in 2025
Social responsibility: the ymca of the roses strengthens communities by addressing critical needs related to food insecurity, housing instability, newcomer integration, community development, and support for vulnerable populations.during 2025, ymca food programs provided more than 33,900 meals and snacks to youth and families facing food insecurity. Southern community services (scs) provided case management, utility assistance, emergency support, food assistance, and referrals to community resources, serving 2,810 individuals and families throughout southern york county.the new american welcome center (nawc) supported immigrants and newcomers through referral services, immigration assistance, workforce support, and english language instruction. During 2025, the nawc served 2,855 individuals through these services, helping newcomers successfully integrate into their communities and build pathways toward economic stability and self-sufficiency.the ymca also continued operating the clay street shelter in lancaster city, a low-barrier emergency shelter for individuals experiencing homelessness. During 2025, the shelter served approximately 600 unduplicated individuals and provided more than 29,000 bed nights of emergency shelter, case management, and supportive services. Operating 85 shelter beds every night of the year, clay street shelter plays a critical role in addressing homelessness and connecting individuals with pathways toward stability and permanent housing.in addition to emergency shelter services, the ymca maintained 120 single-room occupancy housing units, including 114 permanent affordable housing units and 6 emergency housing units. These units remained approximately 90 percent occupied throughout the year, providing stable housing for individuals with limited housing options.together, the ymca's housing and shelter programs included 120 affordable housing units and an 85-bed emergency shelter, providing a total inventory of 205 housing and shelter accommodations.through its healthy living, child care, youth development, and social responsibility programs, the ymca of the roses strengthened communities throughout york and lancaster counties in 2025. The ymca served 25,272 members, engaged approximately 2,000 youth through youth development initiatives, provided childcare and early learning services to more than 1,000 children, delivered more than 33,900 meals and snacks to youth and families, served 2,810 individuals and families through southern community services, supported 2,855 newcomers through the new american welcome center, and provided emergency shelter and housing services through 120 affordable housing units and an 85-bed emergency shelter. Across all program areas, the ymca provided $623,273 in financial assistance and subsidized services, ensuring that programs remained accessible regardless of ability to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.5%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 82.5%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.54; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.5% of revenue deployed · 82.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 27 of 27 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $13.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $181K · 37 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $6.1M reported
- Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.