Ymca of Southeast Missouri
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431666987
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Sikeston, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5734729622
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,345,516
- Expenses
- $1,635,648
- Assets
- $6,738,122
- Liabilities
- $15,509
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM MARSHALL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHRIS HODGKISS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SUSANNE CHITWOOD (DIRECTOR)
- WILLIAM MARSHALL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TYRONE WHITE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The ymca mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy body, mind and spirit for all. The ymca emphasizes the value of honesty, respect, caring and responsibility.
What it reported doing in 2024
The ymca offers numerous adult programs which aim to enhance the body, mind and spirit of participants. Many exercise activities are offered for adults and senior citizens. Built into these programs are opportunities for social activities that go beyond the programs themselves. Periodically adults are asked to participate in other y volunteer functions or community service activities. The y also offers an arthritis exercise program in collaboration with the local health department which is available to the community at large at no charge. The y facility houses numerous y programs and the facilities are available to y members. These facilities include a fitness center, gymnasium, walking track, aquatic center, youth gym and nursery. These areas are available to members at no additional fee. The y does make its pool available during the summer months to the youth of the community wha are not members for a daily fee of $4. The y also has several youth-serving agencies that are provided memberships through its financial assistance program. These are typically youth and the y memberships provide them and their leaders a place to recreate.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.2%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.12; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.2% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.