YULA High School
Legal name: Yeshiva of Los Angeles Girls High School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203081128
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2021
- Official website data refreshed
- Jun 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Phone
- 310-203-3180 (YULA Boys); 310-203-0755 (YULA Girls)
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Secondary, High School
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,629,210
- Expenses
- $7,233,492
- Assets
- $11,849,701
- Liabilities
- $6,033,071
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SETH BERKOWITZ (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- RAQUEL WEISS (DIRECTOR OF JUDAIC STUDIES): $284,082 total reported compensation
- YEHUDIS BENHAMOU (GENERAL STUDIES PRINCIPAL): $227,266 total reported compensation
- NATALIE WILLIAMS (PRINCIPAL): $202,020 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
YULA (Yeshiva of Los Angeles) is a Modern Orthodox yeshiva high school that trains inspired Jewish leaders through an uncompromising dual curriculum of Torah/Judaic and general studies, combining a Beit Midrash-centered Torah education with academic/professional preparation. We are proud to be in the business of training the next generation of inspired Jewish leaders. As a proudly Modern Orthodox school, we work hard to provide our students with an exceptional educational experience in both Judaic and General studies, where collaboration and inquiry are part of the educational ethos. Our school pillars of **Primacy and Relevancy of Torah** , **Uncompromising General Studies** , and **Character Development** are felt throughout our hallways. We also strive to inculcate within our students a deep love for the State of Israel, and for our brothers and sisters who live there. Our...
What it reported doing in 2021
The education provided by the organization integrates torah studies with those of western civilization and the american democratic heritage. The general studies curriculum is college preparatory in nature while the torah studies curriculum is focused on developing highly educated, critically thinking jewish women whose worldly interactions are informed by torah observant principles.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 65% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 74.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $284K · 22 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.