Yes on Prop 6 End Slavery in California

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 994107302
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2025–2025
Forms available: Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location: Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone: 9162855733
Rating: 76
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue: $2,206
Expenses: $73,042
Assets: $62,773

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

Paul Briley (Principal)
Carmen-Nicole Cox (Officer)
Shawnda Deane (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Educate the voters the benefits of passing Proposition 6 in the 2024 CA General Election. A yes vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for a crime and authorize the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to award credits to incarcerated persons who voluntarily participate in work assignments.

What it reported doing in 2025

Educated voters on the benefits of passing Proposition 6 in the 2024 CA General Election by the following methods: Phonebank Lawn Signs Radio Ads Website and Online Ads.

Operating model

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 84
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 20
Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
Program expense ratio: 55.8%; rating input score 56

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -3,211.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -198.6% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -72.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 55.8% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
Schedules: 1 filed schedules
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.