YES Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842256680
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Sykesville, MD, USA
Phone
4437433354
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alzheimer's Disease

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,854
Expenses
$61,305
Assets
$109,333

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Deborah Hanna (Executive Director (non-voting))
  • Shannon Hammond (President/Director)

People named in this filing

  • Deborah Hanna (Executive Director (non-voting))
  • Shannon Hammond (President/Director)
  • Linda Baumler (Treasurer/Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

YES(Young-onset dementia Education and Support) provides education and support to families affected by young-onset dementia (diagnosis before age 65)

What it reported doing in 2025

Care Partner Wellness Retreats: Recognizing that care partners cannot fulfill the daily demands of caring for someone with dementia without caring forthemselves, YES offers respite retreats to care for these care partners.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48%; rating input score 48
  • Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 41%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.78; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 33.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 38.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 48.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.