Yellowstone Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030374417
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Yellowstone National P, WY, USA
- Phone
- 3073442291
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,399,157
- Expenses
- $6,979,808
- Assets
- $14,378,652
- Liabilities
- $1,352,175
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFF BROWN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFF BROWN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $133,017 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The yellowstone association in partnership with the national park service, connect people to yellowstone national park and our natural world through education.
What it reported doing in 2014
Aid to yellowstone national park for educational exhibits and interpretive equipment; support for research library operations and training; acquire archival items; community outreach efforts; support wolf, raptor, and wildlife health research and visitor education; print interpretive trail leaflets.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.06; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 14 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.