Yakima Police Athletic League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830364712
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Yakima, WA, USA
Phone
5097576200
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$3
Expenses
$4,690
Assets
$30,107
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ED SHOENBACH (PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA DALE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ED SHOENBACH (PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA DALE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SARA DAY (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide the youth of the city of yakima a positive influence by providing sports programs and other related healthy activities.

What it reported doing in 2022

Ypal provides a workable alternative to gangs and drugs and helps youth in the yakima community become better citizens and students through various activities in a positive environment. Ypal staff is a mix of local volunteers and civilian staff to promote mutual respect and understanding among volunteers and youth in the yakima community. Participation in programs teach valuable life skills, such as leadership, teamwork, and responsibility. Ypal offers programs ranging from an after school program, boxing and wrestling training, youth leadership program, tutoring and art classes, field trips, and the recently added computer lab. Due to beginning to close operations of the organization, services provided in 2022 were limited.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -156,233.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.42; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.