Xo World Project Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 933340424
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Glen Rock, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2012204700
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $264,824
- Expenses
- $37,072
- Assets
- $260,139
- Liabilities
- $1,285
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- COLLEEN BRENNAN (CEO/CO-FOUND)
People named in this filing
- COLLEEN BRENNAN (CEO/CO-FOUND)
- STEPHANIE COHEN (CO-FOUNDER)
- KATHLEEN P O'HARA (VICE CHAIRMA)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
It is the mission of xo world project foundation to improve the quality of life for women and children in poor underserved communities around the world by providing essential healthcare. Our multi-pronged approach will include improving the delivery of local care by training healthcare professionals and bringing more advanced medical specialists and surgical expertise to local regions, finding sustainable solutions for hospital infrastructure via program assistance and medical equipment donation while expanding community health outreach programs aimed at preventing devastating diseases such as cervical cancer. Xo world project foundation is equally committed to combating the factors that contribute to poor health by increasing access to clean water, sustainable food sources, and education.
What it reported doing in 2024
Womens health-the mission of xo world project foundation is to improve the quality of life for women and children in poor, underserved communities around the world by providing essential healthcare. A multi pronged approach includes improving the delivery of local care by training healthcare professionals and bringing more advanced medical specialists and surgical expertise to local regions, finding sustainable solutions for hospital infrastructure via program assistance and medical equipment donation, and expanding community health outreach programs aimed at preventing devastating diseases such as cervical cancer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - Revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 29
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 35
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 9.6%; rating input score 10
- Program expense ratio: 68.5%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 86%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.02; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 9.6% of revenue deployed · 68.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 6 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.