Wyoming State Oncology Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851796720
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Rockville, MD, USA
Phone
3019849496
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$95,000
Expenses
$89,296
Assets
$89,784
Liabilities
$26,721

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSHUA BINKS (PRESIDENT)
  • CARA A HARSHBERGER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • AMY SMITH (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ACCC - SEE SCHEDULE O (ALL CAN BE REACHED C/O ORG)
  • JOSHUA BINKS (PRESIDENT)
  • CARA A HARSHBERGER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Wyoming state oncology society (wsos) represents the common interest of all care providers involved in the treatment of patients with cancer throughout the state of Wyoming. We provide educational programs, networking opportunities, and robust advocacy support to help practices stay ahead of the shifting healthcare landscape and meet the challenges that directly impact how they care for their patients.

What it reported doing in 2024

The society held 4 regional education symposiums to educate members on the current and update treatments of cancer patients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.1%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 37.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.1% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.