Wyoming Ophthalmological Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742339259
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Cheyenne, WY, USA
Phone
3076352424
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,100
Expenses
$1,827
Assets
$13,591
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BARRY WELCH MD (PRESIDENT)
  • SHEILA BUSH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • ANNE MILLER (DIRECTOR)
  • BARRY WELCH MD (PRESIDENT)
  • SHEILA BUSH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Wyoming ophthalmological society (wos) is a statewide membership-based organization dedicated to the purposes of promoting and advancing the study and advancement of ophthalmology, protecting the public, bettering the medical profession, and perpetuating the best traditions of medicine and medical ethics.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Wyoming ophthalmological society (wos) has dedicated efforts in recent years to protect public health and safety. Advocating to ensure that patients seek and receive treatment for their eyecare needs from the best trained medical professional is central to the mission of protecting public health. This advocacy was pursued through a variety of means, including patient education, statewide legislative advocacy, social media marketing and advertising.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47.6%; rating input score 48
  • Program expense ratio: 54.7%; rating input score 55

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.44; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -60.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47.6% of revenue deployed · 54.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.