Wyoming Governor's Residence Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742543531
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cheyenne, WY, USA
Phone
3077777398
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,116,268
Expenses
$1,187,945
Assets
$2,312,537
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

People named in this filing

  • SUSAN SAMUELSON (CHAIR)
  • KATHRYN BOSWELL (SECRETARY)
  • LAURIE BOX (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To enhance the Wyoming governor's residence and support the initiatives of the first spouse.

What it reported doing in 2024

Wyoming hunger initiative serves a wide audience across the state, recognizing that hunger affects children, families, seniors, and veterans alike. We believe hunger in Wyoming is a solvable problem. Our work focuses on preventing food insecurity by increasing awareness, supporting local anti-hunger organizations, and fostering collaboration through innovative programs. By elevating and connecting local solutions, we aim to build nourished kids, healthy families, and thriving communities. Wyoming hunger initiative supports communities and anti-hunger organizations through infrastructure grants for equipment and projects, along with additional funding for emergency, summer, and holiday meal programs. These efforts help strengthen the long-term viability of local partners and promote sustainable approaches to reducing food insecurity across Wyoming.food from the farm + ranch leverages Wyoming-grown agricultural products to address food insecurity while meeting two challenges; providing farmers and ranchers a meaningful way to support neighbors in need, and bridging the price gap between what the food bank system can pay for external protein sources and the cost of processing high-quality, locally produced protein.through partnerships with the university of Wyoming extension, the cent$ible nutrition program, and the master gardener program, we also distributed seeds and provided infrastructure grants to organizations interested in growing additional produce for donation through the grow a little extra campaign.Wyoming hunger initiative provides beef sticks through beef for backpacks for weekend food bag programs to ensure children have access to high-quality protein on weekends. These protein resources are offered at no cost to partner organizations that distribute them to families in their communities.additionally, food from the field, in collaboration with the Wyoming game & fish department, Wyoming department of agriculture, and processors statewide, enables hunters to donate harvested game. Processors prepare the meat for distribution through local organizations, ensuring it reaches individuals and families facing food insecurity.Wyoming hunger initiative also addressed significant school meal debt that had accrued. After a period during which school meals were available at no cost, we worked with dedicated donors to ensure students returned to school without outstanding balances. Now that we are beyond the pandemic, we continue to support school districts in managing and reducing meal debt and are refining long-term strategies to assist families moving forward.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.7%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $22.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 61.1%; rating input score 61; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.95; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 32.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.7% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 56 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 56 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.