Wyoming Airport Operators Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721585657
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Jackson, WY, USA
- Phone
- 3072778271
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,520
- Expenses
- $174,918
- Assets
- $103,200
- Liabilities
- $1,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Devon Brubaker (President)
- Michelle Anderson (Vice President)
- Kyle Butterfield (Past President)
People named in this filing
- Devon Brubaker (President)
- Michelle Anderson (Vice President)
- Jordyn McDougall (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Wyoming Airports Coalition promotes the benefits of air service in Wyoming and provides a voice for our state's airport operators, directors, and owners through our annual conference. Additionally, the Coalition serves as a voice for our state's airport operators at the local, state, and federal legislative levels.
What it reported doing in 2025
Other program services: $405.91 (Awards); $139.31 (Bank Service Charges); $3,668.62 (Business Expenses); $15,597 (Charitable Contributions); $5,400 (Computer/Software Purchase); $115 (Dues and Subscriptions); $27.25 (Licenses and Permits); $302.21 (Office Supplies); $3,264 (Other Expenses); $10,000 (Governors Business Forum); $1,147.45 (QuickBooks Payment Fees); $286.20 (Printing/Reproduction); and $238.99 (website).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 34.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $175K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.