Wylie Baseball & Softball Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475398692
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Wylie, TX, USA
Phone
4699551483
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$94,502
Expenses
$102,357
Assets
$109,328

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lance Wallace (President)

People named in this filing

  • Lance Wallace (President)
  • Stephen Pilant (VP Operation-BB)
  • Sam Dominguez (VP Operation-SB)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Wylie Baseball and Softball Association is three-fold: 1)To provide safe, enjoyable, recreation opportunities for the youth of Wylie, TX and surrounding communities; 2)To teach the fundamentals of these sports in a safe and nurturing environment, where all children have an opportunity to play regardless of skill level; and 3)That each child will learn the importance of sportsmanship, teamwork, honor, and integrity while sharing with their coaches and teammates the emotions of both success and failure.

What it reported doing in 2020

During 2020, 732 children participated in the Spring baseball program and 595 children in the Fall program. These young athletes came not only from Wylie, TX, but also surrounding smaller communities that lacked the means to provide such activities. Participants were taught the fundamentals of the sport in a safe and nurturing environment, where all children had the opportunity to play regardless of skill level. These children also learned the importance of sportsmanship, teamwork, honor, and integrity from 126 volunteer coaches. Despite space constraints due to the number of fields and volunteer coaches in a season, no child was turned away due to financial hardship.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.7%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 76

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.3%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -22.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -18.7% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.7% of revenue deployed · 76.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $78K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.