Wyland Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330543876
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Phone
9496437070
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$502,336
Expenses
$575,744
Assets
$717,382
Liabilities
$371,221

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVE CREECH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEVE CREECH (PRESIDENT)
  • GREG STONE (DIRECTOR)
  • CARLTON LUND (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The wyland foundation is dedicated to promoting, protecting, and preserving the world's ocean, waterways, and marine life. The foundation encourages environmental awareness through education programs, public arts projects, and community events.

What it reported doing in 2024

National mayor's challenge for water conservationsince 2010, more than 1,000 u.s. Cities have participated in the wyland national mayor's challenge for water conservation. In 2025, residents pledged hundreds of thousands of specific water-saving and pollution prevention actions, including reducing single-use plastics, limiting fertilizer and pesticide use, and adopting water-smart landscaping. Related initiatives included myvolunteerwater projects, which engaged households in at-home pollution prevention, and water-wise parks, which demonstrated sustainable landscaping practices to reduce urban runoff. Examples include communities such as dallas, westminster, and san clemente.wyland clean water mobile learning experiencethe wyland foundation's 1,000-square-foot mobile science center visited over 30 communities in 2025, reaching more than 15,000 students, with a focus on title i schools and underserved areas. The program features a theater and hands-on learning stations that demonstrate how stormwater runoff carries pollutants to rivers, lakes, and oceans, providing students with direct lessons in water conservation and pollution prevention.national water is life art challengemore than 25,000 k-12 students from 45 states have participated in the wyland water is life art challenge, creating artwork that reflected the cultural, economic, and ecological value of clean water. In 2025, classrooms received educational resources, art supplies, and large-format canvases, providing students with opportunities to connect creativity and environmental education.streams of hope digital platformthe foundation launched streams of hope, a new educational platform that integrates water quality testing, student storytelling, and digital engagement. In 2025, pilot programs in laguna beach, san clemente, and anaheim enabled students to conduct water testing, upload results, and create digital pages to share findings. The platform aligns with ngss and common core standards and provides measurable outcomes for teachers and students.water's extreme journey mazethe water's extreme journey traveling maze exhibit engaged families at museums and science centers nationwide. The 1,000-square-foot exhibit demonstrated the water cycle and showed how household behaviorssuch as chemical use and water conservationimpact local watersheds.climate, heat + health projectin 2025, the wyland foundation piloted a climate, heat + health outreach initiative in disadvantaged communities of southern California. Working with with local health agencies, businesses, and universities, the program trained 7 undergraduate fellows and 30 bilingual outreach specialists, engaged over 1,250 residents, donated and planted 250 shade trees, reached 500 students through the mobile learning center, conducted community risk assessments, screenings, provided essential information to reduce extreme heat risk, and co-hosted a health and climate fair for 500 residents. The initiative demonstrated the connection between community health and environmental resilience, with a long-term objective of scaling the model for use by other nonprofits in the region.regional and community projectsart lessons in the wild, conducted in partnership with dana wharf whale watching, provided students and families with on-the-water art and science lessons aboard a 63' catamaran, reaching participants with education on gray whale migration and the importance of clean water.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $525K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.