Wyandot Run Parent Teacher Assoc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311379894
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Powell, OH, USA
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,007
Expenses
$48,860
Assets
$33,855

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kimberly Feldman (Co-President)
  • Amber Scudiere (Co-President)

People named in this filing

  • Kimberly Feldman (Co-President)
  • Amber Scudiere (Co-President)
  • Bethany Kelm (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of Wyandot is to enhance the educational facilities and opportunities for the students of Wyandot Run Elementary School.

What it reported doing in 2024

The primary purpose of wyandot run pto is to enhance both the educational facilities and the opportunities for the students of wyandot run elementary school by providing support for their educational needs by promoting open communication between faculty staff students parents and the administration. Program accomplishments for the 20242025 school year include: supergames. Misc. Programs: wrpto helps fund many programs throughout the year including camp skeeter for first grade a junior achievement biztown field trip and field day for the fifth grade and write shop where students are able to publish their own narratives and art into bound books. Enrichment day for all grades where they learn about various careers and activities available in their local community. And various field trips for all grade levels throughout the year.author visit: noted childrens authors are invited to speak; teacher staff wishlist and teacher supplies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 96% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.6%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.