Wwami Obgyn Clerkship Program

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923442705
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Spokane, WA, USA
Phone
5094969806
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$91,015
Expenses
$74,626
Assets
$166,393

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK SCHEMMEL MD (PRESIDENT &)

People named in this filing

  • MARK SCHEMMEL MD (PRESIDENT &)
  • PATRICIA KOLLENBORN (SEC TRS PRGM)
  • SUSAN LEGEL (DIRECTOR CO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of wwami obgyn spokane is to provide clinical teaching for medical students principally through the required third year clerkship and for selected fourth year students seeking an elective focused experience in women's health. Wwami obgyn spokane provides support and guidence to students and preceptors throughout these clinical rotations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide obgyn rotations to university of Washington school of medicine third year medical students assigned to spokane for this rotation, and to support the students and preceptors in orientation, and throughout the rotations. The organization supported 24 medical students during the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.23; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 54%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 91.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -68.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.