Wvp Health Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833176584
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Salem, OR, USA
Phone
5033717701
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$204,500
Expenses
$57,504
Assets
$147,216
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MANUEL RIVERA (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MANUEL RIVERA (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $701,208 total reported compensation
  • LISA LADD (TREASURER & SECRETARY): $226,664 total reported compensation
  • KRISTA LOVAAS (DIRECTOR): $156,091 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Leading community collaborations to provide improved medical, dental, and behavioral health care for all residents within Oregon's willamette valley. Its focus will be to identify opportunities to provide improved medical, dental, and behavioral health care innovation and to foster collaboration between health care providers, administrators, insurers, patients, and other community members for projects focused on improving quality, reducing cost, and improving patient experience in our region.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provider-led health care innovation: goal to implement intervention(s) specific to health care delivery systems, clinicians, and/or patients that focus on the triple aim of: improved quality, reduced cost, and improved patient experience in the communities that wvp health foundation serves.clinical integration: implementation of intervention(s) that advance clinical and financial coordination and integration of stakeholders in the communities we serve.see schedule oskill transfer: efficiently and effectively to transfer skills and learned processes to other wvp health foundation's cco members and their clinics in a collaborative fashion.community engagement: partnership with community members and organizations outside the health care industry to engender population-level public health improvements, aiming to increase community say in and ownership of health and health care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.1%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 14.3%; rating input score 14; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 71.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.56; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 427.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -35% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -48.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $701K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 14/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.