Wvma Educational Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 901009030
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Buckhannon, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3046092024
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $278,464
- Expenses
- $375,692
- Assets
- $100,514
- Liabilities
- $109,874
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- MONICA CROSS (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $76,592 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote a greater awareness of manufacturing careers and the academic preparation required for advanced manufacturing jobs.
What it reported doing in 2024
The wvma educational fund inc. (wvmaef) remains dedicated to fostering the expansion and advancement of West Virginia's manufacturing sector. Recognizing that effective workforce development is essential for the industry to reach its full potential within the state, the wvmaef and its collaborators are focused on securing a pipeline of proficient workers. This initiative aims to satisfy both immediate labor requirements and the anticipated demands of future manufacturing roles.we continue maximizing program impact and quality. Addressing increased demand, we hosted twelve explore the new manufacturing academies this year. These academies successfully raised student awareness; those able to name a state-made product grew from under 40% to nearly 85%, impacting approximately 915 students. Additionally, 15 explore the new manufacturing workshops were held with outreach to 994 middle school students. The fourteen explore student video contest entries set new benchmarks for quality and creativity. Enhanced promotion led to an impressive 57,848 total votes. This year, explore the new manufacturing introduced the graphic design contest for middle schools. Students designed product posters with local manufacturers, resulting in 41 submissions from 12 schools. This initiative engaged new partners and successfully expanded program participation. The manufacturing day virtual lab series continued construction of its library framework. The manufacturing innovation challenge experienced further growth this year, involving 17 teams that completed projects reflecting a level of sophistication comparable to that of industry professionals. This initiative continues to enhance students' technical proficiency and communication skills while demonstrating the clear advantages of manufacturer involvement. As partners increasingly recognize the value of their volunteer efforts, the challenge continues to flourish. The scrap program provided students of various ages with diverse opportunities to showcase their creativity, ranging from sewing projects and ornament contests to window displays. These initiatives allowed 12 participating teams to demonstrate innovative talents in both stem and artistic fields. The 2024-2025 programming year was marked by significant achievements within the workforce development program. Reaching approximately 215 students across five regions, the initiative featured 17 distinct activities, such as coaching sessions, virtual information meetings, and live mock interview exercises. Industry partners contributed their expertise to guide students in mastering essential professional tools, including the development of impactful elevator pitches, polished resumes, and effective interview techniques. We held six regional awards ceremonies across West Virginia, including a new ceremony for the new river region. This event featured project presentations from the explore student video contest, graphic design challenge, scrap, and manufacturing innovation challenge. The ceremony recognized emerging elite in manufacturing, outstanding industry educator, and outstanding industry champion recipients. These winners, along with future makers distinction schools, were also showcased at the virtual state ceremony. Additionally, the year included four educator roundtables, two student advisory panels, and four manufacturer advisory panels.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.09; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $299K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $77K · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.