Wvaa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
852031768
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Providence, KY, USA
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,053
Expenses
$30,488
Assets
$142,211

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Judy Whitfield (President)

People named in this filing

  • Robin Harrell (Treasurer)
  • Judy Whitfield (President)
  • Hannah Poe (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

WVAA is being formed as an auxiliary to the Webster Co Veterans Association located in Providence KY. WVAA will support veterans and our local community. WVAA wants to honor the sacrifices and commitment of every man and woman who has severed in the United States Armed Forces. WVAAs members will volunteer to organized activities for children in the community. For example Christmas party Halloween party Easter party donations to local schools. WVAA plans to organize a scholarship fund to award local individuals who need assistance with college expenses.

What it reported doing in 2025

WVAA is being formed as an auxiliary to the Webster Co Veterans Association located in Providence KY. WVAA will support veterans and our local community. WVAA wants to honor the sacrifices and commitment of every man and woman who has severed in the United States Armed Forces. WVAAs members will volunteer to organized activities for children in the community. For example Christmas party Halloween party Easter party donations to local schools. WVAA organized a scholarship fund to award local individuals who need assistance with college expenses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 24.6%; rating input score 25
  • Program expense ratio: 96.7%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 74.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.66; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 24.6% of revenue deployed · 96.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.