Wv Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463022382
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Belle, WV, USA
Phone
3045530927
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Safety, Disaster Preparedness & Relief N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,599
Expenses
$1,958,713
Assets
$1,721,634
Liabilities
$590,667

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNY GANNAWAY (EXECUTIVE DI): $72,881 total reported compensation
  • JOHN LIPPHARDT (EXECUTIVE DI): $23,534 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Wv voad is the West Virginia counterpart to the national voluntary organizations active in disaster. Wv voad is a humanitarian association of independent organizations active in all phases of disaster: preparation, response, recovery and mitigation. Its mission is to identify unmet needs and facilitate efficient delivery of services to those imperiled or impacted by disaster.

What it reported doing in 2024

Disaster relief - the organization provides and organizes support for victims of a major disasters. One such disaster occurred on june 23, 2016, when many West Virginia residents experienced historic flooding across the state. Wv voad operated this program, in part, with a community development block grant passed through the west viriginia department of health and human services, as well as contributions from individuals, other philanthropic organizations, and corporate donors. In 2023, wv voad continued its work in preparedness, response, and recovery, and responded to disasters in may 2023 a flood affecting mercer county; in august 2023 flooding in boone, calhoun, clay, harrison and kanawha counties, and in november 2023 a gas outage affected kanawha county. Wvvoad continued to provide assistance to families affected by a august 2022 flood event that affected residents of mcdowell, jackson, fayette, wayne, cabell, and kanawha counties. Further, wv voad distributed personal protective equipment, food, and sanitation supplies to individuals and families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,392%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $73K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.