Wtx Royalty
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 994985587
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Odessa, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4322145381
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Soccer
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,823
- Expenses
- $27,823
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE LLANEZ (MEMBER)
- ULISES GULLIEN (MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to provide an inclusive, community-focused youth soccer program that promotes physical health, teamwork, discipline, and personal growth. We are committed to fostering a positive environment where players can develop athletic skills, build confidence, and learn the values of sportsmanship, leadership, and respect both on and off the field.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our Program Service Accomplishments are the following: Placed 2nd in the Barcelona Academy Cup in Round Rock, Texas (Feb. 2025)Placed 1st and 2nd in Statik Indoor Winter League in Odessa, Texas (March 2025)Placed 1st in West Texas Blowout in Odessa, Texas (April 2025)Placed 1st in the Cinco de Mayo Tournament in Midland, Texas (May 2025)Placed 1st in the Flame FC Tournament in Midland. Texas (July 2025)Placed 1st in the Statik Indoor Summer League in Odessa, Texas (August 2025)Placed 1st in the Labor Day Cup in San Antonio, Texas (September 2025)Placed 1st in the Copa de Campeons in El Paso, Texas (October 2025)Placed 1st in The Spot Fall League in Odessa, Texas (November 2025)Competed in Premier Copa in Melissa, Texas (June 2025)Competed in The Spot Spring league (May 2025)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.