Wta Tour, Inc.
Legal name: Wta Tour Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133792400
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Petersburg, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7278955000
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $142,609,065
- Expenses
- $147,507,084
- Assets
- $119,193,852
- Liabilities
- $115,140,502
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PORTIA ARCHER AS OF 72024 (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- MARINA STORTI (WTA VENTURES CEO)
- FABRICE CHOUQUET (SR VICE PRESIDENT)
- MELISSA PINE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KATHLEEN STROIA (SR VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOHANNA LAWLER THRU 122023 (FORMER PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARINA STORTI (WTA VENTURES CEO): $2,358,473 total reported compensation
- JOHANNA LAWLER THRU 122023 (FORMER PRESIDENT): $1,549,852 total reported compensation
- MATTHEW CENEDELLA THRU 122024 (COO AND TREASURER): $1,409,453 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To fuel the growth of professional women's tennis, elevate the profile of women's tennis, improve the product for fans, and accelerate commercial growth for the benefit of players, tournaments, and everyone involved.
What it reported doing in 2024
Sponsorships - the wta has various sponsorship agreements thatprovide for annual fees. The wta has certain obligations underthese agreements and have been granted certain rights by thetournament class members and player class members as required bythese sponsors under these agreements.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 47
- Accountability: 43
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 18.2%; rating input score 18; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.97; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 2 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.4M · 22 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $10.6M reported
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 18/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.