WSK
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932512577
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Holliston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 5082826368
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food, Agriculture, and Nutrition N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $121,704
- Expenses
- $172,534
- Assets
- $141,757
- Liabilities
- $11,934
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MADISON COLANTONIO (PRESIDENT)
- BRIANA COLANTONIO (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MADISON COLANTONIO (PRESIDENT)
- BRIANA COLANTONIO (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of water street kitchen is a community oriented project that will provide a collaborative space for local food entrepreneurs, caterers, and food truck owners to test and produce their products. Located a short distance from holliston's farmers market and the holliston rail trail, water street kitchen intends to bring together holliston and surrounding communities through food. Water street kitchen will provide support and guidance to its occupants through applied grant funding, consulting from local universities, small culinary arts classes, and two complete commercial kitchen spaces for collaboration in a modern, 21st century setting.
What it reported doing in 2025
Rentals/memberships
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.6%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 27.9%; rating input score 28
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -41.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 92.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -25.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.6% of revenue deployed · 27.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.