Wsia Talent Advocacy & Engagement Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853686906
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8167413910
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $236,859
- Expenses
- $690,396
- Assets
- $2,039,486
- Liabilities
- $12,437
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
People named in this filing
- CARLTON MANER (CHAIR)
- TONY CHIMERA (VICE CHAIR)
- RAHMAD BAULDRICK (DIRECTOR (TERM START 03/2025))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The wsia talent advocacy & engagement foundation was founded in 2020 to stimulate and attract a broad pipeline of talent for the wholesale, specialty and surplus lines insurance industry. (expanded mission on schedule o)the foundation strives to:- provide education resources and programs designed to cultivate a culture for wsia and its membership where all people feel supported and have what they need to succeed in the industry;- remove any barriers to enable all people to compete on a level playing field; and- foster synergy with similar initiatives among all industry participants.
What it reported doing in 2025
The foundation was organized for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of wholesale & specialty insurance association. (continued on schedule o)the foundation's initiatives and partnerships include:- annual summer internship program- annual academic scholarships- grants to existing college/university risk management and insurance programs- student symposiums- support of gamma iota sigma (gis) and the gis foundation-support of the national veterans chamber of commerce -inclusive culture initiatives including mentorship, inclusive leadership
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 92%; rating input score 92; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -191.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.95; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 44.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -27.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $636K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $233K reported
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.