Wright-patt Credit Union Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
310278870
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Beavercreek, OH, USA
Phone
8007620047
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$600,728,000
Expenses
$543,282,000
Assets
$9,066,358,561
Liabilities
$8,236,521,000

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

36 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRENT DAVID CARROLL (MARKET PRESIDENT - COLUMBUS MARKET (END 03/2024))
  • JOSHUA SCOTT HAYES (VICE PRESIDENT, HUMAN RESOURCES)
  • TIMOTHY J MISLANSKY (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • BENJAMIN THOMAS REMPE (PRESIDENT OF MYCUMORTGAGE, LLC (END 09/2024))
  • PAUL SUTOR (PRESIDENT OF MYCUMORTGAGE, LLC)

Highest reported compensation

  • TIMOTHY J MISLANSKY (PRESIDENT & CEO): $1,163,491 total reported compensation
  • DANIEL G SMITH (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $801,457 total reported compensation
  • STEVEN J HARRELL (DIRECTOR, RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS): $589,601 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is to help people through life, which includes: to promote thrift among its members; to establish, on a cooperative basis, facilities for savings; to provide credit for provident and productive purposes; to provide assistance to its members for effective use of their assets and resources; and all activities necessary and incidental thereto.

What it reported doing in 2024

Dividends paid to members on approximately 1,178,822 deposit accounts held by approximately 521,206 members (dividends $192,544,958; including a special patronage dividend of $6,750,782).

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 90%; rating input score 90; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.6%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.69; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.91; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 36 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.7M reported
  • Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 78 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 22 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.