Penn Highlands Healthcare
Legal name: WRC Senior Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251552925
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Brookville, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8148491205
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,615
- Expenses
- $346,350
- Assets
- $13,911,742
- Liabilities
- $1,136,783
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Mark Norman (Director/COO): $715,216 total reported compensation
- Gregory Bauer (Director/CBDO): $389,639 total reported compensation
- Julianne Peer (Board Member): $330,632 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
WRC Senior Services provides care options for generations, built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, offering residential and personal care, home and community-based services, and skilled/rehabilitative health care. At**Penn Highlands Healthcare** we provide residents of the communities we serve with access to the region’s best hospitals, physicians, home care agency, nursing homes and other affiliates who believe that healthcare should be managed by local board members. With the nine hospitals of Penn Highlands Healthcare - Penn Highlands Brookville, Penn Highlands Clearfield, _A Campus of Penn Highlands DuBois_, Penn Highlands Connellsville, Penn Highlands DuBois, Penn Highlands Elk, Penn Highlands Huntingdon, Penn Highlands Mon Valley, Penn Highlands State College, _A Campus of Penn Highlands Huntingdon and_ _Penn Highlands Tyrone_ _._ Penn Highlands strives to provide...
What it reported doing in 2024
Wrc senior services provides management services to non-profit organizations within wrc organizational family in a cost effective manner. Wrc senior services is an organization that provides a range of services and support for seniors. Their offerings typically include assisted living, skilled nursing care, rehabilitation services, and memory care for individuals with dementia or alzheimer's disease. They focus on enhancing the quality of life for seniors by providing personalized care plans, social activities, and wellness programs. Additionally, they may offer respite care and support for families and caregivers. The goal of wrc senior services is to ensure a safe, comfortable, and engaging environment for seniors to thrive.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,431.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 40.17; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 53.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $301K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $715K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 30 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.