Wrare Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822407985
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Castaic, CA, USA
Phone
6613132294
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$101,560
Expenses
$31,635
Assets
$112,699
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Eric Wiese (Co-Founder/President)

People named in this filing

  • Rashi Wiese (Co-Founder/Secretary/Treasurer)
  • Eric Wiese (Co-Founder/President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A non-profit organization dedicated to saving dogs in need through fostering, adoption, rehabilitation, positive training, humane education, and community outreach.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, WRARE Foundation rescued, rehabilitated, and rehomed dogs in need through active foster and adoption programs. The organization hosted multiple community adoption events, including collaborative events with YogaSix and Starbucks, connecting rescue dogs with adoptive families and raising public awareness about animal adoption. WRARE pulled 3 at-risk dogs from Castaic Animal Shelter successfully rehomed 2 dogs, and continues to provide care for 10 shelter dogs. The organization also began development of rescue-focused media content to advance public education on animal adoption and shelter reform. WRARE served the greater Los Angeles and Santa Clarita communities through humane education and community outreach initiatives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 31.1%; rating input score 31
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 68.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.56; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 31.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.