Wounded Warrior Umpire Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473816725
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Daytona Beach, FL, USA
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Employment Procurement Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $148,258
- Expenses
- $149,281
- Assets
- $45,203
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Greg Wilson (President)
- Rich Padilla (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Greg Wilson (President)
- Rich Padilla (Vice President)
- David Pritchett (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Wounded Warrior Umpire Academys mission is to provide instruction training placement and peer to peer support for military veterans interested in baseball.
What it reported doing in 2024
WWUA 2024: Our initial membership course. This is a 10-day camp and was held in Carlisle Pennsylvania. We welcomed 21 new members 3 returning Alumni and 30 staff and volunteers. This course teaches the initial instruction of baseball umpiring while providing all necessary equipment training manuals and experience necessary to reconnect to their local communities and work as an umpire. The camp provides a renewed sense of purpose and belonging while also developing a peer to peer support network to achieve deeper connections between Veterans struggling with transition or disabilities. Cost per participant is approximately $3500 each and includes lodging airfare and meals. To date we have trained 186 veterans.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 72.4%; rating input score 72
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.9% of revenue deployed · 72.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $108K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.