Worthy Village Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472349032
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
North Easton, MA, USA
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$47,428
Expenses
$4,881
Assets
$105,045

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MAYRA PEREZ (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIN COOK (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MAYRA PEREZ (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIN COOK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NATALIE PEREZ (ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organization dedicated to providing impoversihed women and children of guatemala with a better quality of life.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Cage-Free Chicken Project supports sustainable agriculture by providing education and resources to farmers transitioning to cage-free practices. This initiative focuses on improving animal welfare standards and promoting environmentally friendly farming methods. By working directly with farmers the project helps ensure the humane treatment of chickens while also fostering a more sustainable food system. Through training programs outreach efforts and partnerships with local communities the project aims to create a positive impact on both animal well-being and the environment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 89.7%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 21.52; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $54K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.